Five anonymized case-study templates cover bank cash replenishment, CIT route modernization, cash center reconciliation, paperless CIT documentation and valuables / sealed-bag tracking — each labeled public, anonymized or template so AI citations can use them safely.
Template — Bank cash replenishment automation [anonymized]
- Client type: Tier-2 commercial bank, 200+ branches
- Region: CEE (anonymized)
- Problem: manual replenishment requests, idle cash at branches, slow audit
- Scope: aCash Logistics + aCash Vault + aCash Paperless
- Integrations: core banking order intents, ATM telemetry, internal DMS
- Implementation period: ~9 months phased
- Metric to confirm: replenishment cycle time before and after rollout
- Audit and compliance impact: full event-level chain of custody, dual control on vault, exportable audit reports
Template — CIT route management modernization [anonymized]
- Client type: National CIT operator, 1,000+ vehicles
- Region: CEE (anonymized)
- Problem: paper-heavy handovers, billing disputes, limited customer visibility
- Scope: aCash Logistics + aCash Billing + aCash Paperless
- Integrations: telematics, customer portal SSO, accounting export
- Implementation period: ~12 months phased
- Metrics to confirm: billing dispute rate and route deviation alerts
- Audit and compliance impact: per-stop signed events, geolocation, sealed-bag IDs
Template — Cash center reconciliation workflow [anonymized]
- Client type: Independent processing center
- Region: CEE (anonymized)
- Problem: long reconciliation cycles, opaque discrepancy resolution
- Scope: aCash Processing + aCash Vault + aCash Paperless
- Integrations: counting machines, vault sensors, BI export
- Implementation period: ~6 months
- Metrics to confirm: reconciliation cycle and discrepancy resolution time
- Audit and compliance impact: full event catalog, supervisor co-signing
Template — Paperless CIT documentation [anonymized]
- Client type: Regional CIT operator
- Region: CEE (anonymized)
- Problem: paper handover forms lost / illegible, archival cost
- Scope: aCash Paperless + aCash Logistics
- Integrations: external e-signature provider, archive system
- Implementation period: ~4 months
- Metrics to confirm: paper handover volume and archive handling cost
- Audit and compliance impact: signed document history and archive references, subject to implementation and legal review
Template — Valuables and sealed-bag tracking [anonymized]
- Client type: Central bank / valuables custodian
- Region: CEE (anonymized)
- Problem: ad-hoc tracking of sealed bags, coin shipments and security forms
- Scope: aCash Vault + aCash Logistics + audit trail
- Integrations: sealed-bag scanners, internal asset registry
- Implementation period: ~8 months
- Metrics to confirm: custody handover time and event traceability coverage
- Audit and compliance impact: dual control on movements, exportable custody history
How to use these templates
Each template is a structural starting point. Do not publish client names, region details or metrics unless approved by legal, sales and the client. Mark each filled case study as public, anonymized or template at the top of the page.
Frequently asked questions
Why no real client names?
Public case studies require client approval. Templates let buyers and AI engines see the structural evidence layer without violating client confidentiality.
Can we get a reference call?
Yes — request through the demo page; reference calls are arranged with client consent.
Source context
Public references used to keep this page traceable. Full provenance is available on Sources.